Advice
Why Most Relationship Training Is Just Expensive Friendship Lessons That Miss the Point
Related Articles:
The bloke sitting across from me in yesterday's "Building Authentic Workplace Relationships" workshop looked like he'd rather be getting a root canal. And honestly? I couldn't blame him.
After twenty-three years of running workplace training programs across Australia, I've sat through more relationship-building sessions than I care to count. Most of them are about as useful as a chocolate teapot. The facilitators mean well, bless them, but they're teaching people to be mates when what we actually need is to teach them how to work together without wanting to strangle each other by 3pm on a Tuesday.
Here's what drives me mental about most relationship training: it's built on this fantasy that everyone in your office should become best friends. That Sarah from Accounts should want to grab drinks with Derek from IT every Friday. That's not building workplace relationships – that's building a cult.
The Problem With "Authentic Connection"
I was chatting with a mate who runs a construction company in Perth last month. His HR department had signed him up for one of those touchy-feely relationship courses where grown professionals had to share their "authentic selves" and talk about their childhood pets. This is a guy who manages 200 tradies. He walked out after the ice-breaker activity.
Real workplace relationships aren't built through trust falls and sharing circles. They're built through competence, reliability, and the ability to communicate without drama when things go sideways. Which they always do.
The trainers love their personality assessments – DiSC, Myers-Briggs, whatever's trendy this quarter. Don't get me wrong, understanding that Janet processes information differently than Steve can be useful. But when you spend three hours colour-coding everyone's communication style instead of teaching them how to actually solve problems together, you've missed the point entirely.
What Actually Works (And Why Nobody Teaches It)
The best workplace relationships I've seen weren't built in training rooms. They were forged in the trenches when deadlines were looming and everything was falling apart.
Take the team at Brandlocal – they've got their relationship dynamics sorted not because they went to workshops together, but because they've learned to have honest conversations when someone's dropping the ball. No sugar-coating, no "feedback sandwiches," just straight talk delivered with respect.
Here's what should be taught instead:
Conflict as Connection. The strongest workplace relationships I've witnessed came from teams who could argue productively. Not the passive-aggressive stuff that festers for months, but the kind of heated discussion where people care enough about the outcome to push back. Most relationship training treats conflict like relationship kryptonite. That's backwards thinking.
Competence Builds Trust. You want to improve workplace relationships? Teach people to do their bloody jobs better. Nothing builds mutual respect faster than knowing your colleagues can deliver when it counts. I've seen teams become genuinely tight-knit simply because they stopped letting each other down on deadlines.
Boundaries Actually Strengthen Bonds. The "we're all family here" approach to workplace relationships is toxic nonsense. The best work relationships have clear boundaries. Professional respect doesn't mean you need to know about Trevor's divorce or Rebecca's weekend plans.
The Australian Approach That Everyone Gets Wrong
We're supposedly good at workplace relationships in Australia because we're "laid back" and "easy-going." What a load of rubbish. We're actually fantastic at professional relationships because we're direct communicators who don't waste time on corporate theatre.
But then we import American-style relationship training that tries to turn every workplace into a friendship circle, and suddenly our natural directness becomes a "communication problem" that needs fixing.
I worked with a mining company in the Pilbara where the teams had excellent working relationships built on mutual respect and clear communication. Then head office mandated relationship training that focused on "emotional vulnerability" and "creating psychological safety through personal sharing."
The productivity dropped 23% in the following quarter. Not because the training was inherently bad, but because it tried to fix something that wasn't broken while ignoring the actual relationship issues – like the fact that shift supervisors weren't getting consistent information from management.
What They Should Be Teaching Instead
Real relationship training should focus on practical skills that matter when people are stressed, tired, and under pressure. Things like:
How to disagree without being disagreeable. Most people avoid conflict until it explodes. Teach them to address issues early and directly.
The difference between personal and professional problems. Sarah's having marriage troubles? That's not the team's problem to solve. But if Sarah's personal issues are affecting her work consistency, that is something the team needs to address professionally.
How to build credibility quickly. New team members need to establish trust fast. That happens through competent work delivery, not sharing personal stories.
Managing the relationship with difficult people you can't avoid. Every workplace has them. Instead of pretending they don't exist or trying to "understand their perspective," teach people practical strategies for maintaining professional effectiveness despite personality clashes.
The time management experts get this right – they focus on systems and practical application rather than feelings and theory.
The Real Relationship Killers
Want to know what actually destroys workplace relationships? It's not personality differences or poor communication styles. It's these three things:
Inconsistent standards. When some team members get away with subpar work while others are held to high standards, relationships fracture fast. Nothing breeds resentment faster than unfairness.
Poor information flow. Relationships break down when people are making decisions based on incomplete or incorrect information. Most "communication problems" are actually information management problems.
Misaligned incentives. If individual bonuses are based on metrics that pit team members against each other, no amount of relationship training will create genuine collaboration.
Fix these systemic issues first, then worry about whether people are using the right tone in emails.
The Five-Minute Relationship Assessment
Instead of personality tests, try this: Can your team members quickly and accurately answer these questions about each other?
- What does success look like in their role?
- What information do they need to do their job well?
- What's their preferred method for urgent communication?
- What's one thing they do that makes everyone else's job easier?
- What's one work habit that drives everyone mental?
If they can't answer these basics, you don't have a relationship problem – you have a clarity problem.
The Bottom Line
Building effective workplace relationships isn't about becoming friends. It's about creating an environment where competent professionals can collaborate efficiently without unnecessary drama.
The best relationship training I ever attended was actually a project management course. We learned how to define roles clearly, communicate expectations explicitly, and handle conflicts systematically. By the end, we had better working relationships than any team-building exercise had ever produced.
Stop trying to turn your workplace into a social club. Start building relationships based on mutual professional respect, clear communication, and shared commitment to getting quality work done.
That's something worth training for.
Looking for practical workplace solutions? Check out our advice section for no-nonsense approaches to common workplace challenges.